Skip to main content

Assessment software

Assessment software, built and operated for you

We design, build and run the systems that author, deliver and score assessments — and we stay on for the exam windows, which is where most of the difficulty actually is.

Assessments delivered
TODOAssessments deliveredTODO: over what period, and counted how
Platform availability
TODOPlatform availabilityTODO: measured over which window, excluding what
Institutions served
TODOInstitutions servedTODO: live customers only, not pipeline
Median time to launch
TODOMedian time to launchTODO: from signed contract to first live sitting
TODO: placeholder badge 01
TODO: placeholder badge 02
TODO: placeholder badge 03
TODO: placeholder badge 04
TODO: placeholder badge 05
TODO: placeholder badge 06
TODO: placeholder badge 07
TODO: placeholder badge 08

What we build

Six things we are asked for most

Rarely one on its own. Each of these usually arrives attached to at least one of the others.

  • Assessment platforms

    Item banking, authoring, delivery and scoring as one system rather than four that synchronise overnight.

    TODOTODO: outcome this replaces

  • Exam integrity

    Session controls, evidence capture and audit trails built to survive an appeal, not just to deter.

    TODOTODO: outcome this replaces

  • Integrations

    LTI, SSO and roster sync into the systems an institution already runs, so assessment is not another island.

    TODOTODO: outcome this replaces

  • AI-assisted authoring

    Draft generation and item review with a human approving every item that reaches a candidate.

    TODOTODO: outcome this replaces

  • Analytics and psychometrics

    Item statistics and cohort reporting that tell you whether a question measured anything.

    TODOTODO: outcome this replaces

  • Operate and support

    Running the platform through exam windows, including the fortnight either side when it matters most.

    TODOTODO: outcome this replaces

Countries with active users
TODO
Languages supported
TODO
Data residency regions
TODO
Support coverage
TODOTODO: hours, and in which zones
Team members
TODO

Why it is different

Assessment is a specialism, not a vertical

Three things that follow from treating it that way.

Assessment, not generic software

Scoring rules, item lifecycles and integrity requirements are the hard parts, and they are the parts a general-purpose build gets wrong last and most expensively.

Built for the exam window

Load is not uniform. A platform that is fine in March and falls over in May has not been tested against the only week that counts.

Evidence by default

Every consequential action is recorded in a form a regulator or an appeals panel can read, because reconstructing it afterwards is not possible.

How we work

The commitments that shape everything below them.

  • You talk to the engineers

    The people who answer technical questions are the ones who wrote the code. There is no account layer in between.

  • Accessibility as validity

    If a candidate cannot operate the interface, the score measures the interface. We treat that as a measurement defect.

  • Data stays where it should

    Residency and retention are design inputs, decided before the first table is created rather than retrofitted.

  • No lock-in by obscurity

    Your items, results and audit records are exportable in documented formats. Leaving should be possible.

Scoping

Get a realistic estimate, not a range

Tell us what you need to deliver and to whom. We will come back with a shape, a rough duration and the parts we think are riskiest — including the ones that argue against starting.

  • A written scope you can circulate internally
  • The assumptions the estimate depends on, listed
  • Where we think you should not build

Tell us what you are trying to deliver

A short description is enough to start. If it is not something we should build, we will say so.